PARTIAL PLAINT CANNOT BE REJECTED CASE LAW PAKISTAN - AN OVERVIEW

partial plaint cannot be rejected case law pakistan - An Overview

partial plaint cannot be rejected case law pakistan - An Overview

Blog Article

9 . Const. P. 255/2025 (S.B.) Zubaida W/O Muhammad Irfan V/S Inspector General of Police (IGP) Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The regulation enjoins the police to generally be scrupulously fair into the offender and also the Magistracy is to be sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court in addition to from other courts Nevertheless they have failed to have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The plenty of this power casts an obligation to the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested to get a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated.

The main objectives of police would be to apprehend offenders, examine crimes, and prosecute them before the cours also to prevent to commission of crime, and above all guarantee regulation and order to protect citizen???s life and property. Read more

Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 235/2025 (S.B.) Atif S/o Latif V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252216 Tag:The regulation enjoins the police being scrupulously fair on the offender and also the Magistracy is to be sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court along with from other courts Nonetheless they have failed to have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court.

The ruling of the first court created case law that must be followed by other courts till or Except if either new legislation is created, or maybe a higher court rules differently.

149 . Const. P. 6193/2016 (D.B.) Syed Musawar Shah V/S M.D CSD and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 in the Constitution based on the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued towards the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement while in the FIR lodged by FIA and in the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.

Although there is not any prohibition against referring to case law from a state other than the state in which the case is being read, it holds very little sway. Still, if there is not any precedent during the home state, relevant case law from another state could possibly be regarded as through the court.

Apart from the rules of procedure for precedent, the weight provided to any reported judgment may possibly count on the reputation of both the reporter as well as judges.[seven]

Because of this, just citing the case is more likely to annoy a judge than help the party’s case. Visualize it as calling another person to tell them you’ve found their shed phone, then telling them you live in these kinds of-and-this sort of community, without actually offering them an address. Driving across the community seeking to find their phone is likely to generally be more frustrating than it’s value.

161 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming into the main case, Additionally it is a properly-recognized proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence within the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of the charge, however, that is topic to the procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, with the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-respect the evidence and to reach at its independent findings to the evidence.

Matter:-PROTECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-251830 Tag:Additionally, the main objectives in the police is usually to apprehend offenders, investigate crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and earlier mentioned all, make certain law and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The regulation enjoins the police for being scrupulously fair for the offender and the Magistracy is to make sure get more info a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court and from other Courts, However they have didn't have any corrective effect on it.

In other circumstances as discussed supra pensionary benefits cannot be stopped on account of criminal charges after the retirement of two years; and, is violative with the legislation laid down from the Supreme Court while in the case of Haji Muhammad Ismail Memon, PLD 2007 SC 35. Hence, the competent authority in the parent department with the petitioner along with the Chief Secretary, Sindh, are liable to release the pensionary amount of your petitioner and pay the pension amount and other ancillary benefits into the petitioner to which he is entitled under the regulation within two months from the date of receipt of this order. The competent authority on the respondent is likewise directed to recalculate the pensionary benefits on the petitioner and increases accrued thereon the withheld pensionary benefits with effect from stopping to date. Read more

If granted absolute immunity, the parties would not only be protected from liability in the matter, but could not be answerable in any way for their actions. When the court delayed making such a ruling, the defendants took their request towards the appellate court.

Ordinarily, only an appeal accepted from the court of last resort will resolve such differences and, For a lot of reasons, this sort of appeals will often be not granted.

The discovered Tribunal shall decide the case on merits, without being influenced via the findings from the Impugned order, after recording of evidence of the respective parties. Read more

Report this page